Built For Cars, Not People

American suburbs were built for cars during a time in which it seemed oil would shoot from the ground forever. And once we knew that such was not the case, we kept building suburbs because people wanted to live in them. People were also encouraged to do so by the culture and the government.

I am entirely serious when I say that the biggest problem I have on the streets of Springfield’s urban core is overly-polite drivers (my example yesterday, however, was mistaken — see the comments).

I say that knowing many bicyclists in Springfield have a tougher time on the streets because they live in suburbs built for cars. There are two Springfields — one that is largely hospitable to utility bicycling and one that is not. This is one reason why I promote the 1-mile Solution and Keep a Bicycle at Work.

Can the suburbs be retrofitted for walking and bicycling? I think it’s possible (although costly and, perhaps, politically unlikely), so I intend to explore that question this summer.

Right now I want to talk about two reasons I have such a smooth riding experience in Springfield.

1. The first reason I’ve already mentioned: I ride mostly in the urban core where I live. The streets here form a nice grid. The speed limits are low. Drivers in this area expect to see pedestrians and bicyclists. Goods and services are spaced in such a way that urban core residents are often a short walk from groceries, entertainment, and retail. I chose to live in this area on purpose to gain exactly the benefits I’ve listed.

2. I ride “like I mean it” — a phrase I borrowed from Keri Caffrey, of Commute Orlando, who uses it to mean taking your rightful place in traffic and driving your bicycle like a vehicle. Check out the first video on my page of must-see videos. Riding this way is easier in Springfield’s urban core.

How do we make Springfield even more bicycle-friendly so the folks in our suburbs can enjoy the benefits?

I mentioned retrofitting, which could include creating greenways that connect across neighborhoods, to retail areas, and to other greenways. I’ve also mentioned the 1-MS and keeping a bicycle at work. What else is possible?

I’ve been doing a lot of reading lately about urban planning, transportation, and the so-called great reset. The ideas I’m encountering, and the demographics of our area, tell me that suburbia as currently designed is not sustainable in a world of energy limits — a world we must prepare for.

How do we do that?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 3

  1. Steve A wrote:

    They weren’t really built for cars either. They were built to appear peaceful and safe. Lack of connectivity cut down on neighborhood car traffic. The stores were kept out of the subdivisions for the same reasons. That illusion dies hard, but the car dependence is a result of the desire for peaceful isolation. That desire made a lot of money for a lot of developers. Nowadays those developers tout their paths – which still go nowhere – much like the roads in those developments.

    Posted 26 May 2010 at 4:51 pm
  2. Randy wrote:

    Not only are suburbs not sustainable, much of rural America isn’t either. Once upon a time nearly every small town had a general store for basic necessities. Now only the larger towns have stores, and people who live in tiny towns are 10 or 20 mile away from groceries, and often even farther from employment. As fuel cost rise, things are going to get really tough for those folks…

    Posted 26 May 2010 at 5:13 pm
  3. MamaVee wrote:

    I find the discussion of suburbs and its intent for cars interesting. Being an east coaster everyplace I have lived has been developed pre-car. My current suburb ( which is its own city actually but I call it a suburb ) was settled in 1630. Clearly the mass development of it was post car, but in a way I feel like while I like the true urban centers best ( NY, Boston even, Paris etc etc) my little town is PERFECT for biking. There are 13 villages. I live within 1-2 miles of several.

    hmmm I see a post coming.

    Posted 27 May 2010 at 6:53 am