Sea-Change Coming?

From Ray LaHood’s blog yesterday:

Today, I want to announce a sea change. People across America who value bicycling should have a voice when it comes to transportation planning. This is the end of favoring motorized transportation at the expense of non-motorized.

We are integrating the needs of bicyclists in federally-funded road projects. We are discouraging transportation investments that negatively affect cyclists and pedestrians. And we are encouraging investments that go beyond the minimum requirements and provide facilities for bicyclists and pedestrians of all ages and abilities.

To set this approach in motion, we have formulated key recommendations for state DOTs and communities:

  • Treat walking and bicycling as equals with other transportation modes.
  • Ensure convenient access for people of all ages and abilities.
  • Go beyond minimum design standards.
  • Collect data on walking and biking trips.
  • Set a mode share target for walking and bicycling.
  • Protect sidewalks and shared-use paths the same way roadways are protected (for example, snow removal)
  • Improve nonmotorized facilities during maintenance projects.

Now, this is a start, but it’s an important start. These initial steps forward will help us move forward even further.

I like the sound of that.

But now it’s up to us to do two things:

1. Keep encouraging this kind of thinking.

2. Keep a sharp eye on projects to make sure they don’t make things worse.

That second point is especially important because we can end up with all kinds of inappropriate stuff unless we play a role in helping plan and design. That’s what I’m doing in Springfield. That’s why I’m a member of the STAR Team. That’s why I’m a member of the Bicycle & Pedestrian Committee of the Traffic Advisory Board. That’s why I’m on the transportation committee for the upade of the Strategic Plan.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Comments 3

  1. Keri wrote:

    I like LaHood’s attitude. His heart is in the right place. I worry that the wrong people are in his ear. He needs people like YOU in his ear!

    You’re right, it’s imperative to watchdog and maintain the integrity of projects.

    Posted 16 Mar 2010 at 6:43 pm
  2. Andy Cline wrote:

    Keri… Maybe I should make that a goal.

    Posted 17 Mar 2010 at 11:04 am
  3. Matt L. wrote:

    FHWA followed up with our office a few days after the blog to “inform” us that the new policy statement “does not create new any new requirements for transportation agencies.”

    So, Andy, you are right. Without the public demanding that projects consider the need for pedestrians, transit riders, cyclists, children, elderly and people with disabilities, project implementers will go right on building roads for cars.

    Posted 19 Mar 2010 at 6:43 am