Drive Now, Talk Later

Two bills before the Missouri legislature could make the roads a bit safer for cyclists (and everyone else). According to the Springfield News-Leader, one bill “seeks a ban from talking on a cell phone while driving altogether. The other would require a person to have a hands-free listening device, like a headset or Bluetooth wireless earpiece.”

Driving is a complex task that requires full attention. We humans, however, don’t take this task as seriously as we should. For more on this idea, I refer you to Tom Vanderbilt’s Traffic: Why We Drive the Way We Do. I finished the book this week and will review it next week. The upshot: Talking on a cell phone while driving degrades your driving skill to the level of driver operating with about two shots of alcohol. Texting while driving is equivalent to being dead drunk.

Continuing with the N-L article:

Rep. Charlie Norr, D-Springfield, is not convinced either bill could pass, but he wants to pursue legislation this year to at least ban teenagers from driving while talking on the phone.

“I guess there’s a better chance of passing that than infringing on the rights of adults,” Norr said of his proposal. “Driving is a full-time job. You have to pay attention every second.”

Teenage drivers operating automobiles while talking on the phone and texting should scare you to death. So I think the Missouri cycling community ought to push for passing one of these bills — particularly the most stringent one.

Mupedalpusher has some frightening details from a news article about the bills from Columbia:

A college student was interviewed and her comments and admission to text messaging while driving was enough to scare me to death. In fact, her comments lead me to believe she may kill someone some day. I cannot imagine trying to text message and drive. I pride myself on being good at multitasking but this is unimaginable!

Here’s the scary part of the article:
Sabeena Khosla, a junior at MU, admits she texts regularly while behind the wheel — probably two or three times every time she drives. But if she needs to have a conversation, she’ll call.

She says she knows texting is distracting.
“I’ve been surprised when I’m texting and focusing on the message, and I look up and realize I haven’t been paying attention and could have missed something,” she said.

I suppose we should expect that youth will have a cavalier attitude about the awesome responsibility of driving. But, really, this appears to be the attitude of the vast majority of drivers. We just don’t take driving as seriously as we should. And, as a result, 40,000 Americans die gruesome deaths on our roads each year — torn apart by steel, glass, and pavement.

Technorati Tags:

Comments 5

  1. David Hembrow wrote:

    These sorts of distractions are a very good reason why it’s helpful not to be on the same road as the drivers are on.

    Posted 14 Dec 2008 at 2:04 pm
  2. Andy Cline wrote:

    David… And, perhaps, someday we can get there. But not if the price of gas keeps falling. Today in Springfield it’s about $1.49 per gallon. We should be taxing it up to $4.00 in the short term and to European standards in the long term. That money could help pay to change our transportation paradigm.

    Posted 14 Dec 2008 at 3:33 pm
  3. Ken Chase wrote:

    Thats right, thats why i ride side streets only, even against 1 way traffic laws. I’d rather break the law and be alive than expose myself to drivers following laws made for cars.

    Those laws work pretty well for the cars – if someone makes a small mistake, car on car at <30km/h in the city isnt a big deal you wont get that hurt in a car. 30km/h car vs cyclist tho, dead cyclist.

    No amount of rational discussion with me will ever convince me that breaking traffic laws to keep myself alive around cars is ‘immoral’, either. :)

    Posted 14 Dec 2008 at 3:42 pm
  4. Keri wrote:

    “…infringing on the rights of adults” Norr said…

    Huh?!?

    Since when does anyone have a RIGHT to drive while talking on the phone? Americans don’t have a RIGHT to drive at all. It is a privilege and it comes with responsibilities and conditions.

    Language like this is significant, it demonstrates how insidiously driving has gone from a privilege to an entitlement.

    If we treated driver’s licenses half as seriously as private pilot licenses we would not have 40K+ deaths every year on the roads.

    Posted 14 Dec 2008 at 9:12 pm
  5. acline wrote:

    Keri… Agreed. On first read, however, I took that language to be more of an attempt not to upset the conservatives in the legislature considering that the other two bills don’t have a ghost of chance of passing in Missouri. But, yes, I think it also demonstrates how pervasive the car-centuric culture is.

    Posted 15 Dec 2008 at 8:45 am

Trackbacks & Pingbacks 1

  1. From Springfield Injury Law Blog on 22 Dec 2008 at 4:17 pm

    Shut off teen texting in cars…

    Here is a Springfield News-Leader Editorial that makes a lot of sense. Call your Missouri state senator or representative. Especially if you ride a bicycle or motorcycle on Missouri roads. Missouri lawmakers should support a proposal banning new driver…