A Survey of Downtown Parking

How do you encourage people to use bicycles as basic transportation? There are no easy answers to that question, but there is a general guideline that I think should be the foundation of most answers: Create proper infrastructure. We can, of course, argue about what (and what amount) constitutes “proper.”

Providing places for bicycles to park close to downtown attractions meets my understanding of “proper” in the context of encouraging people to think of downtown Springfield as a cycling destination. The city and developers have been adding bicycle racks recently. I’m pleased to report that these are frame-supporting racks.

This is South Street looking south toward the Mudhouse coffee shop. Wave racks like this one are appearing throughout the downtown area along sidewalks. Some of these racks are placed so one parking position is cut off. Here, obviously, no one can park on the right outside portion of the rack because it is next the the building. I found a few wave racks placed close enough the the street to cut off one parking position.

A rack such as this one, positioned properly, should be able to hold five bicycles comfortably — one each on the outside and one each in the center slots. I suspect the position reflects a general lack of space on the sidewalk. These are great areas for U-racks (see more on U-racks below).

The city wave racks bolt into the sidewalk. This one on McDaniel Street, near properties that MSU leases, is like the wave racks on campus — cemented into a dedicated pad off the sidewalk. This represents one of the best solutions because a rack such as this can hold many bicycles comfortably, and it doesn’t impede pedestrian traffic.

The one problem with racks used by college students is that an alarming number of them get filled up with abandoned bicycles. Of the four parked here (this was fairly early Saturday morning), two appeared to me to be abandoned. Notice the one in the foreground is missing a seat.

The square is home to restaurants, a coffee shop, a library station, MSU, government services, and a few other odds and ends. It is also under redevelopment. This is the northwest corner outside the Heer’s building. There are now wave racks on all four corners of the square. The city added an additional rack outside the library station.

It is common for the racks outside the library to fill. The new rack on the southeast corner, where I park my bicycle, is beginning to attract users. For the most part, the new racks have made parking against sign posts and light poles less attractive. I’m happy about that. Parking against posts and poles is unsightly. But cyclists will use such structures if nothing else is available.

The bus terminal downtown offers long-term bicycle parking in these storage units. I’ve never used one. I have no idea what they look like inside. And I have no idea how often they are used. The whole arrangement doesn’t look attractive to me — either as a parking option or as an intrusion on the cityscape.

I’m wondering if it would be better to provide covered parking for wave racks on this space. These boxes hold four bicycles in a space that could easily accommodate 10 or more. If you’ve ever seen pictures of European bicycle parking, well, you know they could get 110 or more bicycles in this space :-)

These racks are inside the parking garage just to the east of the movie theater in the College Station urban entertainment district. This covered area can park eight bicycles. Two little problems: The rack on the left has been placed uncomfortably close to a big pipe of some kind. And the area is a bit cramped. If eight cyclists actually parked here at one time, there might be a bit of a traffic jam.

I’m happy to see bicycles accommodated in this garage. But it doesn’t appear the developer consulted a knowledgeable cyclist. My first choice would would have been to provide a wave rack across two or three regular parking spaces near the garage entrance.

This parking spot is located in a new outdoor car park on the north side of the theater at College Station. I’m not sure what the developer was thinking. These nice U-racks are great for providing bicycle parking in limited space such as along narrow sidewalks. Look at how much space has been wasted by choosing the wrong style rack. Two wave racks here could provide comfortable parking for a dozen bicycles.

Is there a need to park a dozen bicycles here? I think there will be. When the theater opens and the entire complex is complete I suspect we’ll see many college students flocking here from MSU and Drury. College Station is a very short and easy ride from both schools. And we know college students ride their bicycles downtown.

This is behind the Wilhoit Plaza, which will soon be the new home of The Moxie. There is another wave rack like this one about 20 yards to the left. Both filled on a Saturday morning. Despite the one leaner you see there, none of these bicycles appeared to be abandoned. Considering the number of restaurants, residential lofts, other attractions here, I’d say they need more bicycle parking. I think it’s a certainly that The Moxie will draw more cyclists to its new location.

Just north of here, at the YMCA, is one of the few wheel-bender racks you’ll find in the downtown area. What you see parked there are kids’ bicycles mostly. You’ll find another wheel-bender outside the Springfield Brewing Company brew pub on Market Ave. The one at the brew pub can support a bicycle frame if you park on either end.

While I’ve noted a few complaints in this survey, overall I’m pleased with the general movement to provide bicycle parking downtown. City rules dictate that new construction must provide for bicycle parking. I’m especially pleased to see that the city and developers have chosen to provide racks that support the bicycle frame. What a bummer to ride downtown for a nice dinner and a movie only to discover upon evening’s end that some careless jerk toasted your front wheel.

UPDATE: For more on bicycle parking, you might take a look “Bicycle Parking and Storage,” a lesson in the Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation. The authors of this document do not favor wave racks because they favor racks that provide support for two points on a bicycle frame, e.g. U-racks. I happen to disagree. But my disagreement may be a function of my being used to parking at wave racks. I also think waves provide a more efficient use of space in some circumstances. The aptly named “toast” style (i.e. “Yikes! My wheel’s been toasted!”) and comb style are potential wheel-benders. I’m now looking into the merits of other styles. And I’m hoping our European friends (re: the comments) will share their parking methods with us.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Comments 10

  1. David Hembrow wrote:

    “Frame supporting racks”, which generally seem to be some variation on a Sheffield Rack type of cycle parking, seem to be another thing that English speaking countries really like, but which you don’t find are so popular in countries where there is a lot of cycling.

    The Netherlands does it differently. Here people are using bikes with racks and panniers or baskets etc. and they really don’t want their bikes to fall over while they load them. Hence the bike racks here are designed to stop the situation you have in your last photo in particular where one of the bikes has fallen on the other. The racks here hold the bike upright so that you can put your shopping on it with the least hassle. Much better !

    And as for cycle lockers. You can see a fair few of them at in this video which I took two years ago on a house hunting trip in NL. They are at the railway station in Geldrop, a town of 28000 people.

    http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=R1gPGHKv16s

    Posted 02 Nov 2008 at 1:39 pm
  2. Andy Cline wrote:

    David… What part of the bicycle are these racks you mention supporting? How do you prevent wheel bending?

    UPDATE: David, I just returned from the store with about 20 pounds of cargo — roughly 10 pounds in the front basket and a 10-pound bag of charcoal strapped to the back. This particular store does not have a bicycle rack. But I am able to park against a pillar that has a metal rail around it (I assume to keep shopping carts from crashing into it). I parked against it using my U-lock. My kick stand supported the weight of the bicycle.

    On the way to the store I was thinking about your comment and my questions. After I started loading my bicycle and fighting to keep it from tipping, it dawned on me: What kind of a kick stand are you using? I ask because I see no way the wheel-benders I’m used to seeing could possibly hold a bicycle steady while it’s being loaded. So I’m thinking you must be using a forked stand, or a type of rack I’m not familiar with, or both.

    Hmmmm… I would love it if you could cover the nuts-and-bolts of European parking methods on your blog. (That request also goes for my other European readers, too.) Thanks!

    Posted 02 Nov 2008 at 1:56 pm
  3. David Hembrow wrote:

    I think it’s a shame that the pejorative term “wheel bender” has appeared in English and gets applied to all kinds of cycle parking which hold the front wheel.

    The cycle parking here generally is designed to hold the front wheel. It’s really the only way of holding the bike upright and allowing easy access to the back end for loading. However, they’re rather superior “wheel benders” which support more than just a small part of the radius of the wheel. They work very well.

    I’ve not had a wheel “bent”, and that includes with one of these supporting the front wheel of the Xtracycle while I load a crate of beer either side at the back.

    It takes a lot to bend a bike wheel.

    I’ve realised I don’t have a good close-up photo of such parking. I’ll fix that !

    However, there are glimpses of some kinds of cycle parking in some of the photos here: http://hembrow.eu/cycling/photos.html

    One of the oddest types are the sort where you hang your bike by the handlebars. These are used at schools in order to increase the density of bicycle storage. I can understand why they need high density here. Storing children’s bikes at schools takes up a huge amount of space as it is.

    Posted 03 Nov 2008 at 2:59 am
  4. Andy Cline wrote:

    David… re: pejorative Perhaps we can begin to change this perception if there is a better way. Yes! Please do post some parking photos. That would be a big help.

    UPDATE: I took a look at your collection of photos. All very interesting. A couple of observations:

    1. One of the photos clearly shows parking at what I would call a “wheel-bender,” but I notice that the front tire is supported by two crossbars. This would have the effect of distributing any pressure around a greater portion of the wheel. I’ve never seen anything like this in the U.S.

    2. The kids’ bikes hanging by the handle bars is interesting. Do adults ever use this style? How do you lock up?

    And the photos from the train station have sooooo many bicycles that its difficult to tell what’s going on :-) Although I notice some people lock to poles and fences with less-than-ideal results.

    Posted 03 Nov 2008 at 1:53 pm
  5. Jamie Wynne wrote:

    The bike without a seat you thought could be abandoned may just have a quick release seat, hopefully, for the informed owner. As for the parking lockers, why not? My question is how much does it cost to use it? The ones at the Jordan Valley Parking Garage are free. Parking for cars is not. That’s the key. I’m sorry I don’t remember where I read it, but there was an interview with a mayor in the NL and he said the city planners decided back in maybe the late 60′s or early 70′s that parking downtown would be incredibly expensive to dissuade people from parking (an thus driving) their cars downtown. But one major difference between Springburg and the NL is downtown is an actual destination for our friends overseas. It’s a hub of all things they need. Our downtown has a vision but it isn’t the same type of destination that the Europeans have. The money in this town is 4 miles south. They come down to visit downtown when there’s a destination to got to but then they go back south. The city planners need to make downtown a place for the money to stay.

    Posted 04 Nov 2008 at 7:59 pm
  6. Andy Cline wrote:

    Jamie… re: money Good point. And agreed.

    Posted 05 Nov 2008 at 8:41 am
  7. amsterdamize wrote:

    Andrew, I’m planning to do a bike rack special on Amsterdamize after my return from Copenhagen (Nov 7-10). Hope this will shed some more light on this important part of urban planning.

    Posted 05 Nov 2008 at 1:59 pm
  8. Andy Cline wrote:

    Amster… Excellent :-) I’m looking forward to it. Please publish lots of detail pictures.

    Posted 05 Nov 2008 at 2:21 pm
  9. amsterdamize wrote:

    oh, I will, count on it :)

    Posted 05 Nov 2008 at 3:06 pm
  10. David Hembrow wrote:

    I’ve finally got around to doing a post on cycle parking too, though it might not be quite what you want: http://hembrow.blogspot.com/2008/11/another-view-of-cycle-parking.html

    Marc provides a photo of a tulip stand. These are really good. They support the bike well, and from the front so that they don’t flop over while you’re trying to load up (as happens with sheffield stands and all their variants) and they also have high density (essential with a lot of cyclists) as well as looking good. They also provide a place to tie the frame, and… they look good. The manufacturer has many photos of them here:

    http://www.en.velopa.com/content.php?s=89&ws=0&ppid=132

    Posted 19 Nov 2008 at 3:54 am